THE GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs HITEN KANAJI GADHAVI Advocate - M J FUFAL — 360/2026
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT040004832026
Filing Number
360/2026
Filing Date
27-Mar-2026
Registration No
360/2026
Registration Date
27-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANDVI
Judge
2-Addl. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
20-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11205048250004
Police Station
KODAY POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.HITEN KANAJI GADHAVI Advocate - M J FUFAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Jun-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: Case 360/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Hiten Kanaji Gadhavi, was acquitted of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing foreign liquor (11 bottles of Royal Stag worth ₹1,100). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The panch (witness) who documented the alleged seizure did not support the prosecution's case and was declared hostile, providing no corroboration that the liquor was recovered from the accused's possession. Additionally, the investigating officer's testimony contained significant gaps—no independent witnesses were examined, and no evidence proved the seized location or liquor belonged to the accused. Following precedent from *State of Gujarat v. Sureshbhai S. Patel*, the court ruled that when panch witnesses turn hostile, sole reliance on complainant testimony is inappropriate. Outcome: Accused acquitted; ordered to furnish ₹5,000 bail-bond; seized contraband to be destroyed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jun-2026
Disposed
Addl. CIVIL Judge
-
16-Jun-2026
Further Statement
Addl. CIVIL Judge
-
02-Jun-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. CIVIL Judge
-
26-May-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. CIVIL Judge
-
07-May-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 360/2026
Case Summary: Case 360/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Hiten Kanaji Gadhavi, was acquitted of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing foreign liquor (11 bottles of Royal Stag worth ₹1,100). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The panch (witness) who documented the alleged seizure did not support the prosecution's case and was declared hostile, providing no corroboration that the liquor was recovered from the accused's possession. Additionally, the investigating officer's testimony contained significant gaps—no independent witnesses were examined, and no evidence proved the seized location or liquor belonged to the accused. Following precedent from *State of Gujarat v. Sureshbhai S. Patel*, the court ruled that when panch witnesses turn hostile, sole reliance on complainant testimony is inappropriate. Outcome: Accused acquitted; ordered to furnish ₹5,000 bail-bond; seized contraband to be destroyed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts