THE GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs HITEN KANAJI GADHAVI Advocate - M J FUFAL — 360/2026

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT040004832026

Filing Number

360/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

360/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANDVI

Judge

2-Addl. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

20-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11205048250004

Police Station

KODAY POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HITEN KANAJI GADHAVI Advocate - M J FUFAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Jun-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Case 360/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Hiten Kanaji Gadhavi, was acquitted of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing foreign liquor (11 bottles of Royal Stag worth ₹1,100). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The panch (witness) who documented the alleged seizure did not support the prosecution's case and was declared hostile, providing no corroboration that the liquor was recovered from the accused's possession. Additionally, the investigating officer's testimony contained significant gaps—no independent witnesses were examined, and no evidence proved the seized location or liquor belonged to the accused. Following precedent from *State of Gujarat v. Sureshbhai S. Patel*, the court ruled that when panch witnesses turn hostile, sole reliance on complainant testimony is inappropriate. Outcome: Accused acquitted; ordered to furnish ₹5,000 bail-bond; seized contraband to be destroyed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    Further Statement

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  6. 26-May-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  7. 07-May-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 27-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 360/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Case 360/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Hiten Kanaji Gadhavi, was acquitted of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing foreign liquor (11 bottles of Royal Stag worth ₹1,100). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The panch (witness) who documented the alleged seizure did not support the prosecution's case and was declared hostile, providing no corroboration that the liquor was recovered from the accused's possession. Additionally, the investigating officer's testimony contained significant gaps—no independent witnesses were examined, and no evidence proved the seized location or liquor belonged to the accused. Following precedent from *State of Gujarat v. Sureshbhai S. Patel*, the court ruled that when panch witnesses turn hostile, sole reliance on complainant testimony is inappropriate. Outcome: Accused acquitted; ordered to furnish ₹5,000 bail-bond; seized contraband to be destroyed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case