NANALAL JETHALAL FUFAL vs KASAM OSMAN SAMA (BAJANIYA) — 1/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJKT040001112026

Filing Number

1/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANDVI

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NANALAL JETHALAL FUFAL

    Adv. D N FUFAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KASAM OSMAN SAMA (BAJANIYA)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Order

    Case Summary The court dismissed the civil suit for default against the decree holder due to their lack of interest and indifferent attitude in pursuing the case. Despite being granted sufficient time and opportunities to appear before the court or file proper reports, the decree holder failed to comply, demonstrating no genuine interest in advancing the litigation. The court found the decree holder's conduct inconsistent with the interests of justice and thus dismissed the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court dismissed the civil suit for default against the decree holder due to their lack of interest and indifferent attitude in pursuing the case. Despite being granted sufficient time and opportunities to appear before the court or file proper reports, the decree holder failed to comply, demonstrating no genuine interest in advancing the litigation. The court found the decree holder's conduct inconsistent with the interests of justice and thus dismissed the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case