MANILAL SUNDARJI NAGDA vs LAKHAMAN MERAGBHAI KAMBARIYA Advocate - L J FUFAL — 2/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 39. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKT040000372022

Filing Number

2/2022

Filing Date

18-Jan-2022

Registration No

2/2022

Registration Date

18-Jan-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANDVI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANILAL SUNDARJI NAGDA

    Adv. K P KAGTADA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAKHAMAN MERAGBHAI KAMBARIYA Advocate - L J FUFAL

  2. 2.RAGUBHAI MOHANBHAI BHUVA

    Adv. L J FUFAL

  3. 3.HIMANSHU KANUBHAI PATEL

    Adv. L J FUFAL

  4. 4.RAMSANGJI MURUJI URFE MULUJI SODHA

    Adv. EX PARTY

  5. 5.BHAGUBHA DIPSANGJI SODHA

    Adv. EX PARTY

  6. 6.KESUBHA DIPSANGJI SODHA

    Adv. EX PARTY

  7. 7.KULDIP DIPSANJI SODHA

    Adv. EX PARTY

  8. 8.RAMJIBHAI D. KATUVA

    Adv. K S VASANI

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 24-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 12-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 15-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 18-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 14-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 17-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 03-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 11-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 16-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 20-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 23-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 19-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 24-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 07-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 10-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 19-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 27-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 22-Feb-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 11-Jan-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Civil Court, Mandvi (Kachchh) dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction on January 11, 2024. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the agreement relied upon was signed only by Defendant No. 4, who could not unilaterally bind all co-owners (Defendants 4-7). The court also determined that the balance of convenience favored the defendants, as they had purchased the property through a registered sale deed, and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  25. 11-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 10-Jan-2024

    Order On Injuction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 14-Dec-2023

    Order On Injuction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 29-Nov-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 19-Oct-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 20-Sep-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 03-Aug-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 13-Jul-2023

    Order

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 05-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 28-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 04-May-2023

    Hearing

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 15-Mar-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 09-Feb-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 29-Dec-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 17-Nov-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 22-Sep-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 04-Aug-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 22-Jun-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 13-Apr-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 23-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 18-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Civil Court, Mandvi (Kachchh) dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction on January 11, 2024. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the agreement relied upon was signed only by Defendant No. 4, who could not unilaterally bind all co-owners (Defendants 4-7). The court also determined that the balance of convenience favored the defendants, as they had purchased the property through a registered sale deed, and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case