GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs BHIMA DOSABHAI GADHVI — 3183/2025
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030039472025
Filing Number
3183/2025
Filing Date
20-12-2025
Registration No
3183/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
378
Police Station
MUNDRA MARINE POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHIMA DOSABHAI GADHVI
Hearing History
Judge: 5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
LOK ADALAT
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT |
| 11-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 07-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 24-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unlawful possession of alcohol and sentenced him to acquittal with a fine of ₹100, or 15 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court applied the reformative theory of punishment, considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, and voluntary confession to impose a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unlawful possession of alcohol and sentenced him to acquittal with a fine of ₹100, or 15 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court applied the reformative theory of punishment, considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, and voluntary confession to impose a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts