GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs JITUBHA HAKAMSING RATHOD — 3181/2025
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030039452025
Filing Number
3181/2025
Filing Date
20-12-2025
Registration No
3181/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
389
Police Station
MUNDRA MARINE POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JITUBHA HAKAMSING RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
LOK ADALAT
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT |
| 11-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 07-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 24-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unlawful possession of liquor with intent to consume, and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with an alternate imprisonment of 15 days, applying the reformative theory of punishment given the accused's poor economic status and family circumstances. The court found the voluntary plea of guilt and mitigating factors sufficient to avoid imposing maximum punishment while serving the ends of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unlawful possession of liquor with intent to consume, and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with an alternate imprisonment of 15 days, applying the reformative theory of punishment given the accused's poor economic status and family circumstances. The court found the voluntary plea of guilt and mitigating factors sufficient to avoid imposing maximum punishment while serving the ends of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts