GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs MANSUKH NANJI DUNGARIYA — 3180/2025

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030039442025

Filing Number

3180/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2025

Registration No

3180/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

5-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

388

Police Station

MUNDRA MARINE POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANSUKH NANJI DUNGARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unauthorized possession of liquor and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 or 15 days simple imprisonment in default. The court applied the reformative theory of punishment, considering the accused's poverty and first-time offense, and granted bail pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3180/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unauthorized possession of liquor and sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 or 15 days simple imprisonment in default. The court applied the reformative theory of punishment, considering the accused's poverty and first-time offense, and granted bail pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case