GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT @ THE STATE vs PRADIP SIJU HARIJAN — 3047/2024
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030026632024
Filing Number
3047/2024
Filing Date
29-07-2024
Registration No
3047/2024
Registration Date
29-07-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
FIR Details
FIR Number
529
Police Station
MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT @ THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRADIP SIJU HARIJAN
Hearing History
Judge: 5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
LOK ADALAT
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT |
| 11-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 07-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 05-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court postponed the case proceedings against the accused due to their prolonged absence and the complainant's failure to produce them despite multiple summons. The court held that the case cannot be dismissed merely on grounds of the accused's non-appearance, and permitted adjournment with the condition that proceedings may be resumed when the accused is subsequently apprehended, without any time bar restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court postponed the case proceedings against the accused due to their prolonged absence and the complainant's failure to produce them despite multiple summons. The court held that the case cannot be dismissed merely on grounds of the accused's non-appearance, and permitted adjournment with the condition that proceedings may be resumed when the accused is subsequently apprehended, without any time bar restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts