GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs PUSHPARAJ PAVANLAAL ADIVASI Advocate - V S MEHTA — 2118/2025

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030026032025

Filing Number

2118/2025

Filing Date

02-Aug-2025

Registration No

2118/2025

Registration Date

02-Aug-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0549

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUSHPARAJ PAVANLAAL ADIVASI Advocate - V S MEHTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused guilty of a minor offense under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(a)(a) based on voluntary confession. Considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, and reformative theory of punishment, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 (or 15 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than imposing a stricter punishment, as justice could be served adequately through this lenient approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 12-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2118/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty of a minor offense under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(a)(a) based on voluntary confession. Considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, and reformative theory of punishment, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 (or 15 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than imposing a stricter punishment, as justice could be served adequately through this lenient approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case