GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs PUSHPARAJ PAVANLAAL ADIVASI Advocate - V S MEHTA — 2118/2025
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030026032025
Filing Number
2118/2025
Filing Date
02-Aug-2025
Registration No
2118/2025
Registration Date
02-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0549
Police Station
MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PUSHPARAJ PAVANLAAL ADIVASI Advocate - V S MEHTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court found the accused guilty of a minor offense under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(a)(a) based on voluntary confession. Considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, and reformative theory of punishment, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 (or 15 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than imposing a stricter punishment, as justice could be served adequately through this lenient approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2118/2025
The court found the accused guilty of a minor offense under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(a)(a) based on voluntary confession. Considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, and reformative theory of punishment, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 (or 15 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than imposing a stricter punishment, as justice could be served adequately through this lenient approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts