GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs PALU RAM GADHVI — 1988/2025
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030024472025
Filing Number
1988/2025
Filing Date
24-07-2025
Registration No
1988/2025
Registration Date
24-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
0205
Police Station
MUNDRA MARINE POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PALU RAM GADHVI
Hearing History
Judge: 5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
LOK ADALAT
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT |
| 11-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 07-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 24-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The court convicted the accused of an offense under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (illegal liquor possession). Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's voluntary plea, poor economic status, and role as sole family earner, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with 15 days simple imprisonment as default, rather than imposing maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court convicted the accused of an offense under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (illegal liquor possession). Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's voluntary plea, poor economic status, and role as sole family earner, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with 15 days simple imprisonment as default, rather than imposing maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts