GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs ALTAF GANI BAWA Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 1618/2025

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030020152025

Filing Number

1618/2025

Filing Date

26-Jun-2025

Registration No

1618/2025

Registration Date

26-Jun-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1085

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ALTAF GANI BAWA Advocate - K N GAGIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Mundra-Kutch court convicted the accused under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for illegal possession of liquor. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹100 with 15 days simple imprisonment in default, applying reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's voluntary confession and impoverished background. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 24-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 04-Oct-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 04-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 26-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1618/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mundra-Kutch court convicted the accused under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for illegal possession of liquor. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹100 with 15 days simple imprisonment in default, applying reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's voluntary confession and impoverished background. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case