GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT @ THE STATE vs BIRENDRARAY GOVINDRAY JADAV — 1330/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030018432022
Filing Number
1330/2022
Filing Date
03-08-2022
Registration No
1330/2022
Registration Date
03-08-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
93
Police Station
MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT @ THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BIRENDRARAY GOVINDRAY JADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 10-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Birendraray Govindaray Jadav of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(a), 337, 338 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 177, 184, 134, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the truck involved in the fatal accident on 03/02/2021 that killed Pratipal Morarji Chauhan. While the accident was established, no witness identified the accused as the driver, and no concrete evidence linked him to the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused Birendraray Govindaray Jadav of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(a), 337, 338 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 177, 184, 134, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the truck involved in the fatal accident on 03/02/2021 that killed Pratipal Morarji Chauhan. While the accident was established, no witness identified the accused as the driver, and no concrete evidence linked him to the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts