GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs AJITBHAI KHIMJIBHAI CHAVDA Advocate - N O SODHA — 1460/2025

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030018422025

Filing Number

1460/2025

Filing Date

16-Jun-2025

Registration No

1460/2025

Registration Date

16-Jun-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0751

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJITBHAI KHIMJIBHAI CHAVDA Advocate - N O SODHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1460/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Ajitbhai Khimjibhai Chavda of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing 2 beer tins valued at ₹300 without proper permit. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The panch (witness) testimonies did not corroborate the police search proceedings, and critical procedural safeguards were violated. Notably, the panchas who were present during the raid could not substantiate key details, and independent corroboration—mandatory in search cases—was absent. The court applied the established legal principle that police evidence of searches must be corroborated by independent sources, particularly panch testimony, and absent such corroboration, conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony. Disposition: Defendant acquitted with benefit of doubt; seized contraband to be destroyed after appeal period; bail bond extended for 6 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 26-May-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 24-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 04-Oct-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 04-Jul-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 16-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 16-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1460/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1460/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Ajitbhai Khimjibhai Chavda of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing 2 beer tins valued at ₹300 without proper permit. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The panch (witness) testimonies did not corroborate the police search proceedings, and critical procedural safeguards were violated. Notably, the panchas who were present during the raid could not substantiate key details, and independent corroboration—mandatory in search cases—was absent. The court applied the established legal principle that police evidence of searches must be corroborated by independent sources, particularly panch testimony, and absent such corroboration, conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony. Disposition: Defendant acquitted with benefit of doubt; seized contraband to be destroyed after appeal period; bail bond extended for 6 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case