GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs AJITBHAI KHIMJIBHAI CHAVDA Advocate - N O SODHA — 1460/2025
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030018422025
Filing Number
1460/2025
Filing Date
16-Jun-2025
Registration No
1460/2025
Registration Date
16-Jun-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
12-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0751
Police Station
MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJITBHAI KHIMJIBHAI CHAVDA Advocate - N O SODHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jun-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1460/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Ajitbhai Khimjibhai Chavda of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing 2 beer tins valued at ₹300 without proper permit. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The panch (witness) testimonies did not corroborate the police search proceedings, and critical procedural safeguards were violated. Notably, the panchas who were present during the raid could not substantiate key details, and independent corroboration—mandatory in search cases—was absent. The court applied the established legal principle that police evidence of searches must be corroborated by independent sources, particularly panch testimony, and absent such corroboration, conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony. Disposition: Defendant acquitted with benefit of doubt; seized contraband to be destroyed after appeal period; bail bond extended for 6 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-May-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Oct-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jul-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1460/2025
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1460/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Ajitbhai Khimjibhai Chavda of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing 2 beer tins valued at ₹300 without proper permit. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The panch (witness) testimonies did not corroborate the police search proceedings, and critical procedural safeguards were violated. Notably, the panchas who were present during the raid could not substantiate key details, and independent corroboration—mandatory in search cases—was absent. The court applied the established legal principle that police evidence of searches must be corroborated by independent sources, particularly panch testimony, and absent such corroboration, conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony. Disposition: Defendant acquitted with benefit of doubt; seized contraband to be destroyed after appeal period; bail bond extended for 6 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts