GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs ABDUL AJIJ JUSAB PATHAN Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 1327/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030016712025

Filing Number

1327/2025

Filing Date

03-Jun-2025

Registration No

1327/2025

Registration Date

03-Jun-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0761

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL AJIJ JUSAB PATHAN Advocate - K N GAGIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused of a petty offense under Section 285 IPC 2023, finding the voluntary plea of guilt admissible. Applying reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's poverty and status as the sole breadwinner, the court imposed lenient sentencing: acquittal with a fine of ₹500 (or 7 days simple imprisonment in default) and directed bail to continue until appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Nov-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 02-Sep-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 07-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 03-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1327/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused of a petty offense under Section 285 IPC 2023, finding the voluntary plea of guilt admissible. Applying reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's poverty and status as the sole breadwinner, the court imposed lenient sentencing: acquittal with a fine of ₹500 (or 7 days simple imprisonment in default) and directed bail to continue until appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case