GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT @ THE STATE vs SHAAMRA KAKU SEDA-GADHAVI Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 1137/2024

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-F. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030013932024

Filing Number

1137/2024

Filing Date

19-Apr-2024

Registration No

1137/2024

Registration Date

19-Apr-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-F

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT @ THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAAMRA KAKU SEDA-GADHAVI Advocate - K N GAGIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1137/2024 Court Decision: The accused, Shamra Kaku Seda (Gadhvi), was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(F) for allegedly manufacturing 50 liters of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 100 on February 24, 2024. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical deficiencies included: (1) the panchas (witnesses) present during the raid did not corroborate the prosecution's version; (2) absence of independent witnesses; (3) procedural irregularities in the search operation; and (4) reliance solely on uncorroborated police testimony. Following established legal precedent, the court held that when panchayat witnesses fail to support the case and independent corroboration is lacking, the benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 26-May-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 19-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 28-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 07-Feb-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 18-Dec-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 09-Oct-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 28-Aug-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 27-Jun-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 17-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 19-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1137/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1137/2024 Court Decision: The accused, Shamra Kaku Seda (Gadhvi), was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(F) for allegedly manufacturing 50 liters of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 100 on February 24, 2024. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical deficiencies included: (1) the panchas (witnesses) present during the raid did not corroborate the prosecution's version; (2) absence of independent witnesses; (3) procedural irregularities in the search operation; and (4) reliance solely on uncorroborated police testimony. Following established legal precedent, the court held that when panchayat witnesses fail to support the case and independent corroboration is lacking, the benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case