GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT @ THE STATE vs SHAAMRA KAKU SEDA-GADHAVI Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 1137/2024
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-F. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030013932024
Filing Number
1137/2024
Filing Date
19-Apr-2024
Registration No
1137/2024
Registration Date
19-Apr-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
12-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT @ THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHAAMRA KAKU SEDA-GADHAVI Advocate - K N GAGIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jun-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1137/2024 Court Decision: The accused, Shamra Kaku Seda (Gadhvi), was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(F) for allegedly manufacturing 50 liters of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 100 on February 24, 2024. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical deficiencies included: (1) the panchas (witnesses) present during the raid did not corroborate the prosecution's version; (2) absence of independent witnesses; (3) procedural irregularities in the search operation; and (4) reliance solely on uncorroborated police testimony. Following established legal precedent, the court held that when panchayat witnesses fail to support the case and independent corroboration is lacking, the benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-May-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Dec-2024
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Oct-2024
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2024
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jun-2024
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1137/2024
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 1137/2024 Court Decision: The accused, Shamra Kaku Seda (Gadhvi), was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(F) for allegedly manufacturing 50 liters of illicit liquor valued at Rs. 100 on February 24, 2024. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical deficiencies included: (1) the panchas (witnesses) present during the raid did not corroborate the prosecution's version; (2) absence of independent witnesses; (3) procedural irregularities in the search operation; and (4) reliance solely on uncorroborated police testimony. Following established legal precedent, the court held that when panchayat witnesses fail to support the case and independent corroboration is lacking, the benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts