GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs MAHENDRASINH MUDUBHA JADEJA — 990/2025

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030012452025

Case disposed

Filing Number

990/2025

Filing Date

22-04-2025

Registration No

990/2025

Registration Date

22-04-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

FIR Details

FIR Number

0074

Police Station

MUNDRA MARINE POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

BOMBAY PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MAHENDRASINH MUDUBHA JADEJA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

11-02-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

06-12-2025

SUMMONS - NOTICE

11-09-2025

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary of Criminal Case No. 990-2025 The court acquitted the accused, Mehendrasinh Mukhba Jadeeja, of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 61(1)(b) for alleged possession of alcohol exceeding 0.05% alcohol content. The court found that mandatory procedural requirements—specifically proper documentation through Forms B and C, and timely submission of blood test samples to the laboratory—were not followed by investigating authorities, creating a fatal defect in the prosecution's case that precluded conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Criminal Case No. 990-2025 The court acquitted the accused, Mehendrasinh Mukhba Jadeeja, of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 61(1)(b) for alleged possession of alcohol exceeding 0.05% alcohol content. The court found that mandatory procedural requirements—specifically proper documentation through Forms B and C, and timely submission of blood test samples to the laboratory—were not followed by investigating authorities, creating a fatal defect in the prosecution's case that precluded conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case