GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs MAHENDRASINH MUDUBHA JADEJA — 990/2025
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030012452025
Filing Number
990/2025
Filing Date
22-Apr-2025
Registration No
990/2025
Registration Date
22-Apr-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0074
Police Station
MUNDRA MARINE POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHENDRASINH MUDUBHA JADEJA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary of Criminal Case No. 990-2025 The court acquitted the accused, Mehendrasinh Mukhba Jadeeja, of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 61(1)(b) for alleged possession of alcohol exceeding 0.05% alcohol content. The court found that mandatory procedural requirements—specifically proper documentation through Forms B and C, and timely submission of blood test samples to the laboratory—were not followed by investigating authorities, creating a fatal defect in the prosecution's case that precluded conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Feb-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Sep-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jul-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-May-2025
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 990/2025
Summary of Criminal Case No. 990-2025 The court acquitted the accused, Mehendrasinh Mukhba Jadeeja, of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 61(1)(b) for alleged possession of alcohol exceeding 0.05% alcohol content. The court found that mandatory procedural requirements—specifically proper documentation through Forms B and C, and timely submission of blood test samples to the laboratory—were not followed by investigating authorities, creating a fatal defect in the prosecution's case that precluded conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts