GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs MUNNASINH YOGENDRASINH Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 654/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030009512026

Filing Number

654/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

654/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

234

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUNNASINH YOGENDRASINH Advocate - K N GAGIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused of a petty offense under IPC Section 223 (instruction in literacy). The accused, a poor person and sole earner in his family, voluntarily confessed to the crime and requested mercy. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the circumstances, the court acquitted the accused on probation rather than imposing imprisonment, finding that justice would be served without custodial punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 654/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused of a petty offense under IPC Section 223 (instruction in literacy). The accused, a poor person and sole earner in his family, voluntarily confessed to the crime and requested mercy. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the circumstances, the court acquitted the accused on probation rather than imposing imprisonment, finding that justice would be served without custodial punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case