GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs PREMDAN RAVIDAN CHARAN Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 651/2026

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030009482026

Filing Number

651/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

651/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

341

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PREMDAN RAVIDAN CHARAN Advocate - K N GAGIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused of an offense under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (illicit liquor production). Considering the accused's voluntary plea of guilt, poor economic status, and reformative principles of punishment, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with a default imprisonment of 15 days, rather than imposing maximum punishment, finding this sufficient to serve the ends of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 651/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused of an offense under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (illicit liquor production). Considering the accused's voluntary plea of guilt, poor economic status, and reformative principles of punishment, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with a default imprisonment of 15 days, rather than imposing maximum punishment, finding this sufficient to serve the ends of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case