GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs PARTH RAMANUJ ACHARYA Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 650/2026

Case under Bombay Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030009472026

Filing Number

650/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

650/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

336

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARTH RAMANUJ ACHARYA Advocate - K N GAGIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 135 (bailable offense) after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. Considering the accused's poor economic background, family circumstances, and applying the reformative theory of punishment, the court acquitted him rather than impose minimum or maximum sentence. The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of ₹500 or face 7 days simple imprisonment, with bail bond conditions continued during appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 650/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 135 (bailable offense) after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. Considering the accused's poor economic background, family circumstances, and applying the reformative theory of punishment, the court acquitted him rather than impose minimum or maximum sentence. The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of ₹500 or face 7 days simple imprisonment, with bail bond conditions continued during appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case