GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs PRIYRAJSINH MOHHABATSINH JADEJA Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 649/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030009462026
Filing Number
649/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
649/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
235
Police Station
MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRIYRAJSINH MOHHABATSINH JADEJA Advocate - K N GAGIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The court convicted the accused of a petty offense under IPC Section 223 (imparting education to a person not entitled). The accused, being poor and a sole earner, voluntarily pleaded guilty. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's circumstances, the court acquitted him under Section 252 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023, rather than imposing punishment. A fine of Rs. 1,250 was imposed, with 15 days' simple imprisonment as an alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 649/2026
Summary: The court convicted the accused of a petty offense under IPC Section 223 (imparting education to a person not entitled). The accused, being poor and a sole earner, voluntarily pleaded guilty. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's circumstances, the court acquitted him under Section 252 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023, rather than imposing punishment. A fine of Rs. 1,250 was imposed, with 15 days' simple imprisonment as an alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts