GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs MUKESHKUMARSINH KRUSHNASINH Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 648/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030009452026

Filing Number

648/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

648/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

289

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHKUMARSINH KRUSHNASINH Advocate - K N GAGIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 223 of the Indian Penal Code (2023) for a bailable offense. The accused, from a poor background and sole earner, voluntarily pleaded guilty. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the circumstances, the court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of ₹1,250 (or 15 days imprisonment in default), with bail to continue pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 648/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 223 of the Indian Penal Code (2023) for a bailable offense. The accused, from a poor background and sole earner, voluntarily pleaded guilty. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the circumstances, the court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of ₹1,250 (or 15 days imprisonment in default), with bail to continue pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case