GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs VIPULBHAI JALUBHAI DEVIPUJAK Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 647/2026
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030009442026
Filing Number
647/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
647/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
345
Police Station
MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VIPULBHAI JALUBHAI DEVIPUJAK Advocate - K N GAGIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court found the accused guilty of committing an offense under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to acquittal with a fine of Rs. 100, or 15 days simple imprisonment in default. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's voluntary confession, poverty, and family circumstances, the court deemed that lenient sentencing would serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court found the accused guilty of committing an offense under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to acquittal with a fine of Rs. 100, or 15 days simple imprisonment in default. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's voluntary confession, poverty, and family circumstances, the court deemed that lenient sentencing would serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts