GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs DHARMESHBHAI JETHABHAI CHAVDA Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 644/2026

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030009412026

Case disposed

Filing Number

644/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

644/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

342

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

BOMBAY PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

DHARMESHBHAI JETHABHAI CHAVDA Advocate - K N GAGIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary The court convicted the accused of a petty offense under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act based on his voluntary plea of guilty. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, and lack of prior record, the court acquitted him rather than impose minimum or maximum punishment, finding that justice would be served. The accused was discharged on probation with a fine of ₹100 or 15 days simple imprisonment in default, with his bail bond continuing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court convicted the accused of a petty offense under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act based on his voluntary plea of guilty. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, and lack of prior record, the court acquitted him rather than impose minimum or maximum punishment, finding that justice would be served. The accused was discharged on probation with a fine of ₹100 or 15 days simple imprisonment in default, with his bail bond continuing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case