GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs DHARMESHBHAI JETHABHAI CHAVDA Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 644/2026
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030009412026
Filing Number
644/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
644/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
342
Police Station
MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DHARMESHBHAI JETHABHAI CHAVDA Advocate - K N GAGIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court convicted the accused of a petty offense under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act based on his voluntary plea of guilty. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, and lack of prior record, the court acquitted him rather than impose minimum or maximum punishment, finding that justice would be served. The accused was discharged on probation with a fine of ₹100 or 15 days simple imprisonment in default, with his bail bond continuing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court convicted the accused of a petty offense under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act based on his voluntary plea of guilty. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, and lack of prior record, the court acquitted him rather than impose minimum or maximum punishment, finding that justice would be served. The accused was discharged on probation with a fine of ₹100 or 15 days simple imprisonment in default, with his bail bond continuing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts