GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs RAMO REVA SATHVARA Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 641/2026
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030009382026
Filing Number
641/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
641/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
100
Police Station
MUNDRA MARINE POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAMO REVA SATHVARA Advocate - K N GAGIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for a drug-related offense (petit offense). Considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, voluntary plea of guilty, and the reformative theory of punishment, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine with 15 days simple imprisonment as an alternative, rather than maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for a drug-related offense (petit offense). Considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, voluntary plea of guilty, and the reformative theory of punishment, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine with 15 days simple imprisonment as an alternative, rather than maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts