GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs KASAM ABDULA SAMEJA Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 640/2026

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030009372026

Filing Number

640/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

640/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

339

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KASAM ABDULA SAMEJA Advocate - K N GAGIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for unlawful possession of alcohol (a petty offense). Considering the accused's poverty, voluntary plea of guilt, and reformative theory of punishment principles, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 100 (with 15 days simple imprisonment as default) rather than maximum punishment, while allowing bail to continue during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 640/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 for unlawful possession of alcohol (a petty offense). Considering the accused's poverty, voluntary plea of guilt, and reformative theory of punishment principles, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 100 (with 15 days simple imprisonment as default) rather than maximum punishment, while allowing bail to continue during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case