GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs ANIL DEVA MATANG Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 639/2026
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT030009362026
Filing Number
639/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
639/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
338
Police Station
MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ANIL DEVA MATANG Advocate - K N GAGIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Mundra Court acquitted the accused of a narcotic drugs offense under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(a)(a), accepting his voluntary plea of guilt. Considering the accused's poor economic background, family circumstances, first-time offense, and the reformative theory of punishment, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine with 15 days' simple imprisonment as default, rather than maximum punishment, finding that justice would be served through this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Mundra Court acquitted the accused of a narcotic drugs offense under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(a)(a), accepting his voluntary plea of guilt. Considering the accused's poor economic background, family circumstances, first-time offense, and the reformative theory of punishment, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine with 15 days' simple imprisonment as default, rather than maximum punishment, finding that justice would be served through this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts