GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs NARAN GABHABHAI KHARVA Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 638/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030009352026

Filing Number

638/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

638/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARAN GABHABHAI KHARVA Advocate - K N GAGIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC 2023 sections 281 and IPC 1860 sections 177, 184 (education-related offenses) after the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty. Considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, reformative theory of punishment, and voluntary confession, the court sentenced the accused to acquittal on probation rather than imprisonment, and imposed a fine of ₹3,500 (with 15 days simple imprisonment as default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 638/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC 2023 sections 281 and IPC 1860 sections 177, 184 (education-related offenses) after the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty. Considering the accused's poverty, family circumstances, reformative theory of punishment, and voluntary confession, the court sentenced the accused to acquittal on probation rather than imprisonment, and imposed a fine of ₹3,500 (with 15 days simple imprisonment as default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case