GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs JILUBHA KUVARJI RATHOD Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 626/2026

Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030009232026

Filing Number

626/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

626/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

433

Police Station

MUNDRA MARINE POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JILUBHA KUVARJI RATHOD Advocate - K N GAGIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Section 12 of the Public Gambling Act for illegal gambling and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 with 7 days' simple imprisonment as default punishment. Considering the accused's poor economic status, family circumstances, and applying reformative theory of punishment, the court imposed a lenient sentence while ordering confiscation of seized cash (Rs. 1,100) to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 626/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 12 of the Public Gambling Act for illegal gambling and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 with 7 days' simple imprisonment as default punishment. Considering the accused's poor economic status, family circumstances, and applying reformative theory of punishment, the court imposed a lenient sentence while ordering confiscation of seized cash (Rs. 1,100) to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case