GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs SUNIL GANPATRAM CHARAN Advocate - K N GAGIYA — 408/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 11th July 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030006072026

Filing Number

408/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

408/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

11-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

123

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL GANPATRAM CHARAN Advocate - K N GAGIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jul-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 408/2026 Government of Gujarat vs. Sunil Ganpatram Charan The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 (endangering life by fire) after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. Applying reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's poor socioeconomic status and family circumstances, the court sentenced him to acquittal with a fine of ₹500 (or 7 days simple imprisonment if fine unpaid), rather than imposing maximum punishment. The court held that justice would be served through reformation rather than strict punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 26-May-2026

    Order

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-May-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 408/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 408/2026 Government of Gujarat vs. Sunil Ganpatram Charan The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 (endangering life by fire) after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. Applying reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's poor socioeconomic status and family circumstances, the court sentenced him to acquittal with a fine of ₹500 (or 7 days simple imprisonment if fine unpaid), rather than imposing maximum punishment. The court held that justice would be served through reformation rather than strict punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case