GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs AFROZ JUSAB BHAI DHRUIYA — 145/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030001902026

Filing Number

145/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

145/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

5-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AFROZ JUSAB BHAI DHRUIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mundra (Gujarat) convicted the accused of a petty offense under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 500 with an alternative 7-day simple imprisonment and acquitted the accused under Section 252 of the CrPC, applying the reformative theory of punishment considering the accused's poor financial condition and family circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 145/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mundra (Gujarat) convicted the accused of a petty offense under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 500 with an alternative 7-day simple imprisonment and acquitted the accused under Section 252 of the CrPC, applying the reformative theory of punishment considering the accused's poor financial condition and family circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case