GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs BHIMJI MANGABHAI BUCHIYA — 144/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030001892026

Filing Number

144/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

144/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

5-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.BHIMJI MANGABHAI BUCHIYA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Case Summary The court convicted the accused of a minor offense under IPC 2023 sections 281, 177, and 184 (rash or negligent act endangering human life). The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and sought mercy, citing poverty and family circumstances. The court, applying reformative theory of punishment, acquitted the accused but imposed a fine of ₹3,500 (or 15 days simple imprisonment if unpaid), considering that justice would be served without imposing rigorous punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
13-Mar-2026

Summons - Notice

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
11-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
13-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 144/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court convicted the accused of a minor offense under IPC 2023 sections 281, 177, and 184 (rash or negligent act endangering human life). The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and sought mercy, citing poverty and family circumstances. The court, applying reformative theory of punishment, acquitted the accused but imposed a fine of ₹3,500 (or 15 days simple imprisonment if unpaid), considering that justice would be served without imposing rigorous punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.