GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs HANUBHA VELUBHA RATHOD Advocate - P T GORADIYA — 97/2026

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030001042026

Filing Number

97/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

97/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

368

Police Station

MUNDRA MARINE POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HANUBHA VELUBHA RATHOD Advocate - P T GORADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for an offense related to education/instruction regarding narcotic substances. The accused, being a poor person and sole earner of his family, received a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 15 days imprisonment in default) instead of maximum punishment, applying reformative theory of punishment principles and considering his voluntary plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 97/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 65(a)(a) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for an offense related to education/instruction regarding narcotic substances. The accused, being a poor person and sole earner of his family, received a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 15 days imprisonment in default) instead of maximum punishment, applying reformative theory of punishment principles and considering his voluntary plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case