GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs KANJI DEVJI HADIYA — 87/2026

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030000942026

Filing Number

87/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

87/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

5-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

372

Police Station

MUNDRA MARINE POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KANJI DEVJI HADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(a)(a) for possession of illicit liquor. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's poverty and family circumstances, the court sentenced him to acquittal (probation) and imposed a fine of ₹100 with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The seized liquor was ordered to be destroyed as per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 87/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(a)(a) for possession of illicit liquor. Applying the reformative theory of punishment and considering the accused's poverty and family circumstances, the court sentenced him to acquittal (probation) and imposed a fine of ₹100 with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The seized liquor was ordered to be destroyed as per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case