GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs MAHENDRASINH MUDUBHA JADEJA — 83/2026

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030000902026

Filing Number

83/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

83/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

5-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

291

Police Station

MUNDRA MARINE POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDRASINH MUDUBHA JADEJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Mundra convicted the accused under Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Section 66(1)(b) for drug-related offense. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹100 and 15 days imprisonment in default, considering the reformative theory of punishment and the accused's voluntary confession and poor economic status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 83/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Mundra convicted the accused under Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Section 66(1)(b) for drug-related offense. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹100 and 15 days imprisonment in default, considering the reformative theory of punishment and the accused's voluntary confession and poor economic status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case