GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE vs DHANRAJ KANA CHEDA GADHVI — 37/2026

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT030000392026

Filing Number

37/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

02-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MUNDRA

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1117

Police Station

MUNDRA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHANRAJ KANA CHEDA GADHVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused, Dhanraj Kana Cheda (Gathvi), of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(1)(b) due to insufficient evidence and procedural defects. The prosecution failed to establish proper documentation (Form-C and blood test records) required to prove the alcohol content exceeded the legal limit of 0.05% by weight, and failed to follow mandatory procedures under the Blood Examination Rules 1959, thereby weakening the case beyond conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 37/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Dhanraj Kana Cheda (Gathvi), of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(1)(b) due to insufficient evidence and procedural defects. The prosecution failed to establish proper documentation (Form-C and blood test records) required to prove the alcohol content exceeded the legal limit of 0.05% by weight, and failed to follow mandatory procedures under the Blood Examination Rules 1959, thereby weakening the case beyond conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case