JAHIR KASAM MANKA vs SAHISTA D/O JUSAB NURMAMAD BAFAN — 196/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJKT020105102025

Filing Number

196/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

196/2025

Registration Date

08-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

46-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAHIR KASAM MANKA

    Adv. A A PADHIYAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAHISTA D/O JUSAB NURMAMAD BAFAN

  2. 2.HASINA W/O JUSAB NURMAMAD BAFAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    This is a Gujarati language court judgment from Gujarat High Court (Case No. 165/2025). The court rejected the accused's appeal challenging a conviction under criminal law. The court found no merit in the grounds raised and upheld the lower court's decision, ordering the accused to pay compensation of Rs. 2,300 and serve the sentence as originally imposed. The judgment affirms that the evidence and legal proceedings were conducted properly according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 196/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Gujarati language court judgment from Gujarat High Court (Case No. 165/2025). The court rejected the accused's appeal challenging a conviction under criminal law. The court found no merit in the grounds raised and upheld the lower court's decision, ordering the accused to pay compensation of Rs. 2,300 and serve the sentence as originally imposed. The judgment affirms that the evidence and legal proceedings were conducted properly according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case