THAKKAR DEEP RAMESHCHANDRA vs LAKHA AKARAM RAMJU Advocate - I A SAMA — 5383/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT020091132025

Filing Number

5383/2025

Filing Date

17-Oct-2025

Registration No

5383/2025

Registration Date

17-Oct-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THAKKAR DEEP RAMESHCHANDRA

    Adv. S J PANDYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAKHA AKARAM RAMJU Advocate - I A SAMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhuj, Kutch disposed of criminal case FO.K.No.P383/2016 by ordering its closure based on a withdrawal petition filed by the complainant through their advocate. The court found that the complainant no longer wished to pursue the case and was formally withdrawing it, thereby terminating the criminal proceedings accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 17-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5383/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhuj, Kutch disposed of criminal case FO.K.No.P383/2016 by ordering its closure based on a withdrawal petition filed by the complainant through their advocate. The court found that the complainant no longer wished to pursue the case and was formally withdrawing it, thereby terminating the criminal proceedings accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case