Government of Gujarat vs SAGARGIRI KISHORGIRI GAUSWAMI — 4304/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT020073442025

Filing Number

4304/2025

Filing Date

21-Aug-2025

Registration No

4304/2025

Registration Date

21-Aug-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11205039250390

Police Station

BHUJ TALUKA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAGARGIRI KISHORGIRI GAUSWAMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under IPC sections 281 and 177 for petty offence and sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default). The court considered the accused's plea of guilty, first-time offence, and lack of criminal history as mitigating factors while imposing the minimum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 10-Nov-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 22-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4304/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under IPC sections 281 and 177 for petty offence and sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default). The court considered the accused's plea of guilty, first-time offence, and lack of criminal history as mitigating factors while imposing the minimum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case