JAY MUKESHBHAI SACHDE PROP. OF SACHDE CONSULTANCY vs KRUNAL PARESH BHATIYA Advocate - V D KANAIYA — 3944/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT020067192025

Filing Number

3944/2025

Filing Date

04-Aug-2025

Registration No

3944/2025

Registration Date

04-Aug-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAY MUKESHBHAI SACHDE PROP. OF SACHDE CONSULTANCY

    Adv. P T JADEJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KRUNAL PARESH BHATIYA Advocate - V D KANAIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhuj, Kutch dismissed the criminal case (FIR No. 3944/2016) after the complainant filed a withdrawal petition through counsel, stating they no longer wished to pursue the case. The court granted the withdrawal petition and disposed of the criminal case accordingly on 14 March 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 04-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 04-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3944/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhuj, Kutch dismissed the criminal case (FIR No. 3944/2016) after the complainant filed a withdrawal petition through counsel, stating they no longer wished to pursue the case. The court granted the withdrawal petition and disposed of the criminal case accordingly on 14 March 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case