Government of Gujarat vs ANOPSINH MALARSINH JADEJA Advocate - H M MAHESHWARI — 3714/2024
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 06th July 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT020060632024
Filing Number
3714/2024
Filing Date
05-Aug-2024
Registration No
3714/2024
Registration Date
05-Aug-2024
Court
CIVIL COURT BHUJ
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
06-Jul-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11205039240179
Police Station
BHUJ TALUKA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANOPSINH MALARSINH JADEJA Advocate - H M MAHESHWARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Jul-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 3714/2024 Court Decision: The accused Anopsinh Malarsinh Jadeja was acquitted under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 2016, Section 65(A)(A). The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused possessed 4 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹80 on the alleged date. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that the panch witness (independent witness) could not corroborate the seizure proceedings, and the accused's actual possession of the contraband material could not be conclusively established. Without independent corroborating evidence and relying solely on police testimony, conviction could not be upheld under Supreme Court precedent standards for seizure validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Jul-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Jul-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
24-Jun-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Jun-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
05-Jun-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
26-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
30-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
11-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
05-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 3714/2024
Case Summary: CC No. 3714/2024 Court Decision: The accused Anopsinh Malarsinh Jadeja was acquitted under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 2016, Section 65(A)(A). The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused possessed 4 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹80 on the alleged date. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that the panch witness (independent witness) could not corroborate the seizure proceedings, and the accused's actual possession of the contraband material could not be conclusively established. Without independent corroborating evidence and relying solely on police testimony, conviction could not be upheld under Supreme Court precedent standards for seizure validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts