JITENDRA VISHRAMBHAI MEVADA(SUTHAR) vs VIMALBHAI JAYNTILAL DORU — 2802/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT020048912025

Filing Number

2802/2025

Filing Date

13-Jun-2025

Registration No

2802/2025

Registration Date

13-Jun-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JITENDRA VISHRAMBHAI MEVADA(SUTHAR)

    Adv. J J LAKHATARIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIMALBHAI JAYNTILAL DORU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Gujarat High Court (Surat bench) ruled that a compromise settlement reached between both parties in a civil dispute is valid and enforceable, and dismissed all pending petitions and miscellaneous applications in the case. The court directed that court fees be calculated and recovered based on the settlement amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 13-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  9. 10-Oct-2025

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  10. 10-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 13-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2802/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court (Surat bench) ruled that a compromise settlement reached between both parties in a civil dispute is valid and enforceable, and dismissed all pending petitions and miscellaneous applications in the case. The court directed that court fees be calculated and recovered based on the settlement amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case