Government of Gujarat vs PRAKASHBHAI DHIRAJBHAI VARSANI — 2695/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(A)(A),98(2). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT020047212025

Filing Number

2695/2025

Filing Date

11-Jun-2025

Registration No

2695/2025

Registration Date

11-Jun-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11205039250134

Police Station

BHUJ TALUKA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(A)(A),98(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASHBHAI DHIRAJBHAI VARSANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Prohibition Act Sections 65(a) and 98(2) for illegal possession of alcohol and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (or 2 days imprisonment in default), with confiscation of seized contraband and return of non-valuable items to the rightful owner. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offence, and clean criminal record as mitigating factors in imposing a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 19-Nov-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 29-Sep-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 11-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2695/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Prohibition Act Sections 65(a) and 98(2) for illegal possession of alcohol and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (or 2 days imprisonment in default), with confiscation of seized contraband and return of non-valuable items to the rightful owner. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offence, and clean criminal record as mitigating factors in imposing a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case