PATHAN RAMJU FAKIRMAMAD vs MAMALATDAR SHREE — 21/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36,37. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT020034562025
Filing Number
21/2025
Filing Date
19-Apr-2025
Registration No
21/2025
Registration Date
19-Apr-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT BHUJ
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PATHAN RAMJU FAKIRMAMAD
Adv. M L MANIYAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAMALATDAR SHREE
-
2.P.I.SHREE B DIVISION POLICE STATION
-
3.GOV T/H DISTRICT COLLECTOR SHREE
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
11-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary The plaintiff's application for interim injunction (CPC Order 39, Rule 1-2) under Case No. 21/2025 has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case regarding ownership of the disputed property and did not provide documentary proof of 30+ years of continuous possession as claimed. Consequently, the requirements for interim relief—including irreparable harm and balance of convenience—were not satisfied against the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2026
Issues
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
30-Jan-2026
Issues
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
07-Jan-2026
Issues
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.
-
26-Nov-2025
Issues
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Oct-2025
Issues
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Sep-2025
Issues
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Jul-2025
Issues
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Jun-2025
Summons - Notice
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-May-2025
Summons - Notice
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 21/2025
Court Order Summary The plaintiff's application for interim injunction (CPC Order 39, Rule 1-2) under Case No. 21/2025 has been dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case regarding ownership of the disputed property and did not provide documentary proof of 30+ years of continuous possession as claimed. Consequently, the requirements for interim relief—including irreparable harm and balance of convenience—were not satisfied against the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts