NITIN JAVAHARLAL SANGHVI vs AADIL JUSAB JAT — 2037/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th July 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT020034292025

Filing Number

2037/2025

Filing Date

18-Apr-2025

Registration No

2037/2025

Registration Date

18-Apr-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

18-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITIN JAVAHARLAL SANGHVI

    Adv. Y D BHANDARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AADIL JUSAB JAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jul-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The case was dismissed by withdrawal. The petitioner (Nitin Javaharlal Sanghvi) declared through a withdrawal petition that he did not wish to proceed further with the matter. The court accepted the withdrawal and disposed of the case accordingly, with all pending applications being closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 11-Jul-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 24-Jun-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 26-May-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 13-May-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 17-Apr-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  10. 26-Nov-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  11. 26-Sep-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  12. 22-Jul-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  13. 20-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 18-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2037/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The case was dismissed by withdrawal. The petitioner (Nitin Javaharlal Sanghvi) declared through a withdrawal petition that he did not wish to proceed further with the matter. The court accepted the withdrawal and disposed of the case accordingly, with all pending applications being closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case