ASHOKBHAI JETHALAL GAMI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 529/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKT020020492026

Case disposed

Filing Number

529/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

529/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

ASHOKBHAI JETHALAL GAMI

Adv. N L VAGHELA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

20-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
ORDER

The court approved the applicant Ashokkumar Jethalal Gami's petition under Section 497 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, ordering the release of frozen bank funds totaling approximately ₹36,597.61 that were seized in a cybercrime case. The court found that the applicant was a victim of cyber fraud, the suspected bank accounts had been identified and seized, and continued freezing would cause financial hardship; therefore, the funds would be unfrozen upon submission of personal and surety bonds worth 1.5 times the frozen amount, subject to conditions that the applicant produce the funds if any third party claims ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court approved the applicant Ashokkumar Jethalal Gami's petition under Section 497 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, ordering the release of frozen bank funds totaling approximately ₹36,597.61 that were seized in a cybercrime case. The court found that the applicant was a victim of cyber fraud, the suspected bank accounts had been identified and seized, and continued freezing would cause financial hardship; therefore, the funds would be unfrozen upon submission of personal and surety bonds worth 1.5 times the frozen amount, subject to conditions that the applicant produce the funds if any third party claims ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case