HARIDKBHAI KETANKUMAR THACKER vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 494/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJKT020018892026
Filing Number
494/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
494/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT BHUJ
Judge
2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARIDKBHAI KETANKUMAR THACKER
Adv. K H BHATIA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bhuj allowed the cybercrime victim's application under Sections 497 and 503 of the BNSS (Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita), ordering the release of Rs. 4,28,597.56 frozen across 224 bank accounts. The court found the investigating officer failed to comply with Section 106(3) requirements by not reporting the seizure to the magistrate, and since no account holder objected and the accounts appeared to be fake vehicles for fraud, the victim is entitled to the recovered funds as interim custody pending final disposal. Banks are instructed to transfer the amount within 10 days without demanding NOC from other agencies when multiple freezes exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bhuj allowed the cybercrime victim's application under Sections 497 and 503 of the BNSS (Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita), ordering the release of Rs. 4,28,597.56 frozen across 224 bank accounts. The court found the investigating officer failed to comply with Section 106(3) requirements by not reporting the seizure to the magistrate, and since no account holder objected and the accounts appeared to be fake vehicles for fraud, the victim is entitled to the recovered funds as interim custody pending final disposal. Banks are instructed to transfer the amount within 10 days without demanding NOC from other agencies when multiple freezes exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts