MOKHA RIJWAN RAMJU vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 493/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJKT020018882026
Filing Number
493/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
493/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT BHUJ
Judge
2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11205042260138
Police Station
BHUJ CITY A DIVISION POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOKHA RIJWAN RAMJU
Adv. I A SAMA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhuj granted the applicant's petition for temporary custody of a seized Suzuki Swift car (Registration No. GJ-12-FB-7928) under CrPC Section 497, ruling that the applicant is the rightful owner based on submitted RC documents and Aadhar card. The court rejected the police's objection, finding no investigative need for the vehicle and relying on the Supreme Court precedent in Sundarlal Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat that prolonged police retention of movable property causes deterioration. The vehicle was ordered released subject to conditions including security deposit, non-transfer undertaking, and production whenever required by court or investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhuj granted the applicant's petition for temporary custody of a seized Suzuki Swift car (Registration No. GJ-12-FB-7928) under CrPC Section 497, ruling that the applicant is the rightful owner based on submitted RC documents and Aadhar card. The court rejected the police's objection, finding no investigative need for the vehicle and relying on the Supreme Court precedent in Sundarlal Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat that prolonged police retention of movable property causes deterioration. The vehicle was ordered released subject to conditions including security deposit, non-transfer undertaking, and production whenever required by court or investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts