JITENDRA ISHWARLAL VELANI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 451/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKT020016702026

Case disposed

Filing Number

451/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

451/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

JITENDRA ISHWARLAL VELANI

Adv. V R JADEJA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

23-04-2026

Disposed

20-04-2026

HEARING

18-04-2026

HEARING

17-04-2026

HEARING

16-04-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

SUMMARY: The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bhuj, Kachchh allowed the application under Sections 497 and 503 of BNSS, ordering the release of Rs. 11,000/- frozen in a Fino Payments Bank account to the applicant Jitendra Ishwarlal Velani, a cybercrime victim whose funds were fraudulently debited. The court found the applicant prima facie entitled to the amount after the investigating officer verified the transaction and confirmed no other claimant objected, with the release conditioned on the applicant furnishing a security bond and surety of equivalent value and appearing for investigation as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bhuj, Kachchh allowed the application under Sections 497 and 503 of BNSS, ordering the release of Rs. 11,000/- frozen in a Fino Payments Bank account to the applicant Jitendra Ishwarlal Velani, a cybercrime victim whose funds were fraudulently debited. The court found the applicant prima facie entitled to the amount after the investigating officer verified the transaction and confirmed no other claimant objected, with the release conditioned on the applicant furnishing a security bond and surety of equivalent value and appearing for investigation as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case