JITENDRA ISHWARLAL VELANI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 451/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJKT020016702026
Filing Number
451/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
451/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT BHUJ
Judge
2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JITENDRA ISHWARLAL VELANI
Adv. V R JADEJA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-04-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bhuj, Kachchh allowed the application under Sections 497 and 503 of BNSS, ordering the release of Rs. 11,000/- frozen in a Fino Payments Bank account to the applicant Jitendra Ishwarlal Velani, a cybercrime victim whose funds were fraudulently debited. The court found the applicant prima facie entitled to the amount after the investigating officer verified the transaction and confirmed no other claimant objected, with the release conditioned on the applicant furnishing a security bond and surety of equivalent value and appearing for investigation as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bhuj, Kachchh allowed the application under Sections 497 and 503 of BNSS, ordering the release of Rs. 11,000/- frozen in a Fino Payments Bank account to the applicant Jitendra Ishwarlal Velani, a cybercrime victim whose funds were fraudulently debited. The court found the applicant prima facie entitled to the amount after the investigating officer verified the transaction and confirmed no other claimant objected, with the release conditioned on the applicant furnishing a security bond and surety of equivalent value and appearing for investigation as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts