ABDULRUF HAMID (MAULANA) SAMA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 433/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJKT020015842026
Filing Number
433/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
433/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT BHUJ
Judge
2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABDULRUF HAMID (MAULANA) SAMA
Adv. A A PADHIYAR
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bhuj ordered the release of Rs. 2,92,607.81 to the applicant, a cybercrime victim, from frozen bank accounts across 110 banks. The court found that the investigating officer violated Section 106(3) of BNSS by failing to report the seizure to the magistrate and that no legitimate claimant has contested the victim's entitlement, making release in the interests of justice. The court also directed banks to comply with court orders without demanding NOCs from other investigating agencies in cybercrime cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bhuj ordered the release of Rs. 2,92,607.81 to the applicant, a cybercrime victim, from frozen bank accounts across 110 banks. The court found that the investigating officer violated Section 106(3) of BNSS by failing to report the seizure to the magistrate and that no legitimate claimant has contested the victim's entitlement, making release in the interests of justice. The court also directed banks to comply with court orders without demanding NOCs from other investigating agencies in cybercrime cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts