ABDULRUF HAMID (MAULANA) SAMA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 433/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKT020015842026

Filing Number

433/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

433/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDULRUF HAMID (MAULANA) SAMA

    Adv. A A PADHIYAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bhuj ordered the release of Rs. 2,92,607.81 to the applicant, a cybercrime victim, from frozen bank accounts across 110 banks. The court found that the investigating officer violated Section 106(3) of BNSS by failing to report the seizure to the magistrate and that no legitimate claimant has contested the victim's entitlement, making release in the interests of justice. The court also directed banks to comply with court orders without demanding NOCs from other investigating agencies in cybercrime cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 433/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bhuj ordered the release of Rs. 2,92,607.81 to the applicant, a cybercrime victim, from frozen bank accounts across 110 banks. The court found that the investigating officer violated Section 106(3) of BNSS by failing to report the seizure to the magistrate and that no legitimate claimant has contested the victim's entitlement, making release in the interests of justice. The court also directed banks to comply with court orders without demanding NOCs from other investigating agencies in cybercrime cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case