Government of Gujarat vs VISHRAM KARSHAN SATHVARA — 764/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 07th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKT020012022026
Filing Number
764/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
764/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT BHUJ
Judge
46-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11205013250710
Police Station
BHUJ TALUKA MANKUVA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VISHRAM KARSHAN SATHVARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Judgment Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate court in Bhuj-Kutch acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 2016, Section 65(F), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the panchnama (seizure document) lacked corroboration from independent witnesses and the prosecution failed to establish the accused's actual possession of the alleged illicit liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 764/2026
Court Judgment Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate court in Bhuj-Kutch acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 2016, Section 65(F), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the panchnama (seizure document) lacked corroboration from independent witnesses and the prosecution failed to establish the accused's actual possession of the alleged illicit liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts