Government of Gujarat vs FAIZ ABDULAJIJ CHAVDA — 761/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT020011992026

Filing Number

761/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

761/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT BHUJ

Judge

45-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11205043251514

Police Station

BHUJ CITY B DIVI POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FAIZ ABDULAJIJ CHAVDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused, Faiz Abdul Aziz, guilty under BNS Section 281 and MV Act Sections 177 and 184, sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 500 or in default, 2 days imprisonment. The judgment was delivered by the Chief Judicial Magistrate at a special lok adalat in Bhuj, where the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and the court considered his clean criminal record as a mitigating factor in imposing a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge and A.C.J.M.

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 761/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Faiz Abdul Aziz, guilty under BNS Section 281 and MV Act Sections 177 and 184, sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 500 or in default, 2 days imprisonment. The judgment was delivered by the Chief Judicial Magistrate at a special lok adalat in Bhuj, where the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and the court considered his clean criminal record as a mitigating factor in imposing a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case